Post by Brent George on Jun 2, 2022 20:59:04 GMT
We - the professions; the developers; the investors; the local body Councils; the media; and the public - have had some time to absorb the edict that central government has declared with regard to adopting medium density residential standards to boost housing supply and enable more types of housing.
See: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development - Enabling Housing Density
The forced changes are proposed to resolve the "housing problem".
They are not insignificant.
They will affect the lives and lifestyles of many "ordinary New Zealander's":-
- they will potentially provide affordable housing opportunities for urban dwellers not only in the central city, but is outer suburbs as well;
- they will require an adjustment to the "kiwi" lifestyle of home ownership - transitioning from typically owning a section with single dwelling, garage, back and front and side yards, vege garden, and outdoor living space for the BBQ - to living in a multi-level dwelling with restricted or shared common outdoor spaces and limited parking and storage options;
- but think of one, two or three 3-storey apartments being erected 1m from your boundary outside your living room view (not to mention the period of construction disruption);
- and consider the congestion on the street with parking and access/egress as new homeowners join your neighbourhood;
- also imagine the likely disruption to infrastructure and services when the systems are overloaded (lack of water supply; blocked wastewater drainage; power outages)
So a philosophical question for survey professional involved in urban development - when they are invited to participate in a project that intensifies housing as outlined by government - could be:
"Would you say "No - our company is not interested in being involved in this development that will negatively impact on the adjoining landowners""?
Or would you go with the flow and do the task, because it is a job, and/or because you know your Client (the developer) will just go somewhere else to get the survey parts done?
See: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development - Enabling Housing Density
The forced changes are proposed to resolve the "housing problem".
They are not insignificant.
They will affect the lives and lifestyles of many "ordinary New Zealander's":-
- they will potentially provide affordable housing opportunities for urban dwellers not only in the central city, but is outer suburbs as well;
- they will require an adjustment to the "kiwi" lifestyle of home ownership - transitioning from typically owning a section with single dwelling, garage, back and front and side yards, vege garden, and outdoor living space for the BBQ - to living in a multi-level dwelling with restricted or shared common outdoor spaces and limited parking and storage options;
- but think of one, two or three 3-storey apartments being erected 1m from your boundary outside your living room view (not to mention the period of construction disruption);
- and consider the congestion on the street with parking and access/egress as new homeowners join your neighbourhood;
- also imagine the likely disruption to infrastructure and services when the systems are overloaded (lack of water supply; blocked wastewater drainage; power outages)
So a philosophical question for survey professional involved in urban development - when they are invited to participate in a project that intensifies housing as outlined by government - could be:
"Would you say "No - our company is not interested in being involved in this development that will negatively impact on the adjoining landowners""?
Or would you go with the flow and do the task, because it is a job, and/or because you know your Client (the developer) will just go somewhere else to get the survey parts done?